Michelle Wong
Media 384
The
Burdens of Not Having and Having a Penis
Media
makes sure that the disadvantages of not having or having a penis is put in our
face everyday, with the intention of us not thinking too much about it. We
enjoy cinemas and media so much, but we tend to question it so little. That is
why an industry was created for the male gaze, that shapes how we are to
present ourselves to society.
Male
gaze is essentially an idea of fabricating women to male pleasure. We started
seeing this trend in European oil paintings that illustrated women in sexual
positions, for the sake of her observer. Berger says in “Ways of Seeing”, “And
so she comes to consider the surveyor and the surveyed.” (Berger, 46) While
knowing the presence of her observer, she also observes herself through her
observer. Women in oil paintings are often looking at mirrors, having a sense
of self-awareness, and that someone is watching her, therefore she has to be in
a pleasant position to be looked at. An oil painting documenting Adam and Eve’s
story illustrates another disadvantage of not having a penis. While Adam and
Eve both committed a sin, Eve is subjected to be own by him, and Adam “becomes
the agent of God.”(Berger, 48) This becomes one of the explanations why women
are property belonging to men.
Woman painted sitting in a position being ready to men to possess her. |
Being
possessed by men allowed male gaze to foster. Possessing someone gives one
power, and through the gaze, men gain power. In possessing them, we are also oppressing
women and in “Why Men Oppress Women”, Steve Taylor says, “The oppression of women
stems largely in men’s desire for power and control.” https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/out-the-darkness/201208/why-men-oppress-women In “Visual Pleasure and
Narrative Cinema”, Malvey dissects one of Freud’s philosophy, scopophilia. She
says, “…he associated scopophilia with taking other people as objects,
subjecting them to a controlling and curious gaze.” (Malvey 835) This idea that
women are mysterious objects, by looking at them, sexualizing them, and having
thoughts of sexual encounters with them demystifies them, and tame them. She
also included a quote from Budd Boetticher, “What counts is what the heroine
provokes…who makes him act the way he does. In herself the woman has not the
slightest importance.”(Malvey, 837) Female characters are heroines for making
the hero take action; so while he does, she is just present. The hero is not
saving the world from a zombie apocalypse though, he is simply “saving” her by
inserting his penis into her, because she “needs” since she is castrated.
Besides
film, video games satisfy the male gaze. There is a lack of female characters
in games. But another problem is the purpose of female characters’ existence.
Their existence is for the intention of pleasing male gamers, with their
unrealistic body configuration. Their tremendous boobs and long thin legs
cannot be condemned in a short skirt and revealing top, and their outfit is not
functional for fighting, but this is all for the sake of male visual pleasure. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CU5laE9ZCdc
Critics
always points out how male gaze affects women, but fails to address the issues
for black women. People of color were not widely represented in media, and when
they were, they’d be subjects of amusement and jokes. For example, Andy ‘N’
Amos, starring two colored gullible men. The under representation is the effect
of oppression to gaze. Gaze is a power,
and people of colored were denied that. In response to this, Bell Hooks coined
the term, Oppositional Gaze. She said, “It was the oppositional black gaze that
responded to these looking relations…” (Hooks, 117). In “Oppositional Gaze”
Bell Hooks also mention how black women were being overly sexualized. While
white women were subjects to be desired by men, black women were looked down
upon. Therefore, many black women refrained from Hollywood and cinemas in
general.
Poor representation of people of color in media. White painted black face actors as two gullible characters. |
We
should consider the system of patriarchy to be one of the causes of these
troubling media illustrations. Even men, the ones with penises are being
affected. Patriarchy “…is assaulting the male body and spirit in our
nation.”(Hooks, 17) In “Understanding Patriarchy” Bell Hook discusses the
limits society puts on gender. While “it was his role to be served; to provide;
to be strong; to think…” it was her “…role to serve, to be weak, to be free
from the burden of thinking…” (Hooks, 18) Then a power dynamic is created where
men owns women. She also talks about how boys are taught to be tough and
emotionless, while girls are to be subtle and emotional. Men are supposed to be
macho, to live up to the examples of men shown on T.V. This is putting
restrictions on society, and not allowing individuals present themselves as
their own self.
I
am affected by the system of patriarchy in a sense that I shouldn’t be too
dominant, or assertive, and ambitious. I unknowingly put myself in a position
where I design myself to cater to men, as much as I’d hate to admit. This is
because I am a woman without a penis. The penis dictates which side of the
spectrum an individual is on, and neither side is the most ideal place to be
in.
Works Cited
Berger,
John. "Ways of Seeing." Journal of Aesthetic Education 8.4
(1974): 46-48.
Mulvey,
Laura. "Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema." Visual and
Other Pleasures (1989): 835-37.
Hooks,
Bell. The Will to Change: Men, Masculinity, and Love. New York: Atria
Books, 2004: 17-18.
Hooks,
Bell. In Black Looks: Race and Representation. Boston: South End Press,
1992: 117
No comments:
Post a Comment